Search found 18 matches
- Thu 29 Nov, 2018 10:52
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: Fast Find Enhanced
- Replies: 44
- Views: 35482
Fast Find Enhanced
Ok, I've managed to reproduce it - it's definitely a plugin bug. The author wanted to display those counters in green, but instead of using a proper "2" ("00000010" in binary) index for that he for some reason used "34" ("00100010" in binary). When "Virt...
- Wed 28 Nov, 2018 20:14
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: Fast Find Enhanced
- Replies: 44
- Views: 35482
Fast Find Enhanced
saiberpink , PavelR This could be a plugin bug or a new renderer bug. I can look into it, but I can't reproduce it - it works just fine with any combination of the mentioned options. Could you provide more details please? I've reproduced it on Windows 10 Pro (10.0.17134.286) by extracting x64 versi...
- Wed 28 Nov, 2018 17:24
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: Fast Find Enhanced
- Replies: 44
- Views: 35482
Fast Find Enhanced
I recommend to use default settings ... Clear Type checked If you use Windows 10 you don't want to use "ClearType friendly redraw". It's a workaround for a problem that has been properly fixed there and it will give you nothing but a slowdown. Thank you for pointing to the reason for the ...
- Wed 28 Nov, 2018 14:02
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: Fast Find Enhanced
- Replies: 44
- Views: 35482
Fast Find Enhanced
I confirm that ClearType / Virtual Terminal breaks the dialog display. I recommend to use default settings Virtual Terminal unchecked, Clear Type checked and the ability to use specific colors achieve by using ConEmu, which adds lots of pretty good functions to terminal (font selection, window runti...
- Tue 27 Nov, 2018 17:30
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: Fast Find Enhanced
- Replies: 44
- Views: 35482
Fast Find Enhanced
I have tested 5328 x64 with (FastFind Enhanced-x64.dll│ 38 400│26.08.13│13:52) on Windows 10 Pro 10.0.17134.286. (Auto '*', Favour shorter matches, Input dialogue on the bottom, Better Scrolling 16) and no problem here. {I've downloaded only 7Z distribution and extracted it and installed the plugin ...
- Thu 09 Jul, 2015 12:49
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: WinSCP Plugin Usage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 17759
WinSCP editing stopped working
FYI: Working scenario: * download x86 version of FAR 3.44000 (7z) * extract WinScp plugin (20019.05.17 - file version: 1.6.2.151, product version: 4.1.9.0) * use predefined putty connection to CentOS 5 (auth by key) * in home directory (default directory after connection) press SHIFT+F4 * fill test....
- Sun 27 Oct, 2013 16:57
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: NetBox — SFTP/SCP/FTP/FTPS/WebDAV client
- Replies: 112
- Views: 149179
Re: NetBox — SFTP/SCP/FTP/FTPS/WebDAV client
WinSCP works fine in FAR 3...pandronic wrote:Did any Far/Netbox developer read this?
This really sucks. Until this is fixed, Far is unusable for me. Meanwhile, I think I'll install Far 2 with WinSCP or look at other file managers.
- Wed 11 Feb, 2009 16:31
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
Is this possible to implement? Correct cancellation (without killing a thread) is possible, but only in Vista and higher. It is great news (it is possible). (Yes, letting the thread to complete - only ignore the result is the correct approach) But bad news for me - I have to upgrade from XP. (And o...
- Wed 11 Feb, 2009 12:50
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
1 minue 4 seconds (cd \\192.168.110.25\rr). It is pretty annoying to check everytime if computer in my folder shortcuts is off or on. And what about pressing ESC to interrupt changing to not responding directory (may be it would be useful also for some removable drives). Is this possible to implement?
- Wed 11 Feb, 2009 11:44
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
At work my delay over 3 minute, after ran command cd \\1.1.1.1\1 . Imho delay depends from work network services, (f.ex. work service: computer browser, master browser..., caching network response) If network wrong set by admins delay be is big, in my case in network exist ~3 master browser (it's w...
- Tue 10 Feb, 2009 10:59
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
Issue 700 - there is wel described and fixed "bug" - thus existing \\server\share is no longer problem. Non-existing (or switched off computer share) for example "CD \\1.1.1.1\1" command takes 60 second and shows system error message like "UNC paths are not supported" (...
- Tue 10 Feb, 2009 02:09
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
User MDA 13 jan 2009 open ticket for plugins NETWORK on MANTIS (FAR bug tracker system) A very long entry in the contents of network folders Description: Under debugger revealed that the function NetBrowser:: IsReadable from the fact that when calling UNICODE version expands the prefix "\\?\UN...
- Mon 09 Feb, 2009 23:48
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
It is great news, thx Martin. Existing \\server\share is displayed without delay now. I think help this patch: drkns 07.02.2009 23:34:36 +0200 - build 765 where far begin work with "\\?\" I do not think that following history line is the fix of the delay (all works in previous versions to...
- Mon 09 Feb, 2009 17:57
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
It is great news, thx Martin.
Existing \\server\share is displayed without delay now.
Existing \\server\share is displayed without delay now.
- Tue 13 Jan, 2009 10:28
- Forum: General Plug-In Discussions
- Topic: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16675
Re: FAR 2.0 b680 - network
I have another difference - if I enter command from history or at command line "cd \\ipaddress\share\" (existing server and share with sufficient rights) it tooks 26 seconds in FAR 2.0 b680 (the same in 732) to proceed the command and list remote directory and in FAR 1.71 there is no delay...